November 10 2009
The year 2009 will be known for many things: notably the most difficult economic period of time since The Great Depression, a circumstance that has left little unaffected. However, less notably, 2009 will also be known as the year that our wine media intractably changed forever.
Despite much virtual ink being spilled this year about mainstream wine writers and their amateur counterparts on the Internet (bloggers and such), it’s still a conversation fraught with teeth gnashing and in situ analysis; it’s a crystal ball gazing conversation about the great big maw known as the “unknown” and what it will bring. And, while all of these conversations are framed in an “us vs. them” “now vs. future” context, the reality is that the lines have already broken down to the point of indecipherability.
It’s less Faustian bargain and more manifest reality.

To quote the comic strip Pogo from 1970, “We have met the enemy and he is us.”
In years past, wine writers mostly wrote offline for a masthead with some dabbling online. Nowadays, however, most wine writers write online with some dabbling offline. It’s a 180 degree turn around and it has mostly happened in the last 14 months.
Simply, there are no professional wine writers or bloggers anymore – we’re all in the same online pool now as a new set of standards take shape for classifying merit.
Two summarizing points:
A) The term “blogger” is passé
There are professional wine writers, professional-amateur (pro-am) wine writers and people that keep wine journals online. Ultimately, the delivery vehicle doesn’t much matter anymore. And, frankly, I don’t want to be considered a blogger anymore and neither should others who consider their work thoughtfully. While it’s a very “affected” thing to say, it’s true. To quote Bernie, a supporting character in the 1986 movie, About Last Night, “A pro, Danny? A pro is how you think of yourself.”
B) The conversation of how people that write about wine get paid has less to do with advertising and more to do with endorsements and sponsorships.
This is a topic I’ll get into in a subsequent post, but it will blur the lines of editorial to a far greater extent than what is indicated by a recent post elsewhere on wine writers hopping back and forth between public relations and journalism.
By way of context, I’ve noticed several things that have led me to these seemingly simple conclusions that are far from simple.
1) Wine Writers Symposium sees wild shifts in audience
W.R. Tish wrote an article on the Symposium for Professional Wine Writers in the June edition of Wine Business Monthly. In that article he noted:
As a group, the symposium-goers represented the reality that wine writing has become a many-headed beast. What separated these writers from their peers was a desire to congregate with fellow scribes in a setting both rich in wine and deep in talented panelists and presenters. What they lacked in Parker-esque panache they more than made up for in passion and commitment.
So which way is the wind blowing in wine writing these days? As an attendee at the first (2005) and most recent symposia, I can state with certainty: it is blowing, with gale force, toward the Internet.
2) Wine sampling to online wine writers has increased 20X
While a novelty in the beginning, wine samples, as indicated by the now standard FTC disclosures, has increased at an incalculable rate. By my personal estimate, I would say at least by a factor of 20X based on quantity.
3) Top bloggers are … professionals
A recent Wine Opinions polled named the top seven wine bloggers and the list comprised, well, all professionals of some sort – Eric Asimov, Jancis Robinson, Stephen Tanzer, Eric Orange from Localwinevents.com, published book author Tyler Colman, wine retailer and personality Gary Vaynerchuk, and Alder Yarrow.
4) Lifestyle journalist starts an online food and wine property
Corie Brown, ex-Los Angeles Times reporter, who covered wine topics, has started an online media property called Zester Daily (as noted in the comments section at Vinography.com).
5) Technorati says of blogging, “Mo Betta’ ”
The 2009 Technorati State of the Blogosphere report, the fifth edition of this annual survey of all things blogging, doesn’t have much new to say except discussing professional bloggers.
6) The book, “Say Everything,” says what needs to be said
In an impeccably researched historical view of blogging, author Scott Rosenberg notes in his book, Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What It’s Becoming and Why It Matters, “Historically, the succession of media forms and technologies follows a predictable pattern: every innovation arrives with a fanfare announcing that it will replace its predecessor. But when the dust settles, the newcomer almost always winds up having redefined that predecessor rather than eliminated it.”
7) The Gartner Hype Cycle moves blogging down the path

Most probably aren’t familiar with the “Gartner Hype Cycle.” Conducted by Gartner, a technology research and advisory company, they provide a framework for placing trends in context based on sentiment and adoption. In the most recent “Hype Cycle” for social software, released in July, they moved “blogging” from the “slope of enlightenment” to the “plateau of productivity” year over year.
By the Gartner definition, this move has blogging transcending a 2008 sentiment of, “experiment to understand the benefits and practical application of the technology” to 2009’s, “A technology reaches the ‘plateau of productivity’ as the benefits of it become widely demonstrated and accepted. The technology becomes increasingly stable and evolves in second and third generations.”
My overall point is this: when hindsight being 20/20 turns into perfect vision, 2009 will be the year in which we note that the cheese moved for good. There are no longer bloggers or professional writers. They are one and the same. Some writers are better than others. Some writers write for a living, while others are hobbyists. Even those hobbyists may pursue their craft ardently; a separation from those that keep online journals for more satisfaction and less externally provided, feedback-oriented gravitas. But, it’s here and it’s now.
In my next post, I’ll define the changing landscape of a little thing called money.
Posted in, Good Grape Daily: Pomace & Lees. Permalink | Comments (18) |
Very good post, Jeff. I, too, am sick of the ‘blogger’ moniker. I always introduce myself as a ‘wine industry writer’. RIP ‘blogger’. And I agree with Michael’s suggestion above. The ‘Online Wine Writers Conference’ sounds good to me.
Nice work, Jeff. Things continue to move at the speed of light on the internet and it’s been interesting to see a lot of it unfold throughout the year.
Nice “who moved my cheese” reference…
Yes, Mike, the WBC must be renamed now
Cheers to bloggers crossing the threshold!
Michael—I think a year from now we’ll have passed the credibility and ethics thing and will have moved into monetization. But, then, I thought that would happen in ‘09 so what do I know?
Ken, thanks for the comment. Who wants to send the email to Joel and Allen? Me or you? Let’s ditch the word “blogger.”
Ed—I love the “who moved my cheese” phrase. In a previous life when I worked for a gigantic company I used to say it when dealing with sloth-like co-workers. They didn’t get the reference, which is kind of ironic.
Courtney—I see me and you being Facebook BFF’s is increasing my CC presence here. I like it!
Jeff
Jeff, I’ll write Joel. We’ll see if we can’t make some headway on this name change.
Salud.
Jeff, I wrote Joel about this matter and included a link to your site. With any luck he’ll post his thoughts here. Otherwise I’ll pass along his sentiments to this space when and if he responds.
Salud.
Two things, Jeff:
1. Wine writing and wine criticism aren’t necessarily the same thing.
2. You nicely gloss over an important distinction between the professional and the hobbyist: as online outlets proliferate, the latter hurts the potential income of the former because a. there are already more outlets than there is need for them b. those who set up the online operations don’t need a lot of money to do it so they undercapitalize their businesses to the point where the lifeblood of that business—content—is not funded.
Under scenario number 2 it’s difficult to see how quality goes up, but maybe that’s because I’m one of those “get out of the way” professional writers who seeks to pay his mortgage…
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the comment.
Re: point #1—I’ve talked about wine criticism in the past, but, generally, I think the cult of personality model is being swept away by Google search and CellarTracker. We’ve only begun to scratch the surface on what this means with mobile, but it’s all all materially online.
Re: point #2—Not a glossing over, just a focus. I’ll cover this in a subsequent post, but I can tell you my thought process is less on advertising as a supporting vehicle and more towards individual endorsements. You, as a wine writer have your own brand and it’s not too far away that you could be a sponsored writer very similar to a Nascar driver. More on this later.
Jeff
To that second point, people will be building their personal credibility regardless of past credentials. As with most broadcasted activities, the public will ultimately decide what is catapulted into popular demand and what remains lifeless.
Jeff,
A sponsored writer very similar to a Nascar driver?
Can’t wait to hear about that. I hope I’ll be allowed to drive as fast as I can…
Would love to read your thoughts about individual endorsements and the connection between those and credibility. Have you been following the BevMo incident?
Excellent post overall. Lover the idea of leaving the word blogger behind, both in context of the Conference and beyond.
Thank you Jeff. Indeed, lots of good food for thought. However, I will always be proud of wearing the blogger badge, because without it, I wouldn’t been recognized. Being a blogger launched me into being a writer that finds a paycheck in the mailbox for something I am passionate about.
Thanks for the post, Jeff. Although, I don’t know if I’m psyched about introducing the wine world to the blood-sucking Gartner analysts (they bleed most of my marketing budget because in Tech they’re just too damn important not to pay!).
These are very good points. At WBC ‘10 I think the best approach (since we’re well on the way as it is) will be to have the community together in a session about the Evolution of Blogging and Wine Writing. Present these ideas, points, counter-points, and then poll the community to decide.
Its a big step and (as Catie points out) are there career writers and there are those who write (or blog) as an important part of their lives. An expression of their personal art, as it were. I would throw out that calling it “hobbyist” is offensive to some and arrogant by others.
There are multiple facets to this discussion that I haven’t spent enough time with my navel lint to think about.
What about Food bloggers that inevitably write great things about wine? Are they now food writers? They write about many of the same problems that wine bloggers write about in terms of ethics, technology, etc etc etc.
Not saying we don’t do it, but I think this is a very important topic that the whole community needs to seriously contemplate. I’m actually with you in the evolution of the whole community. I spoke at the PRof Wine Writer’s Symposium you mention and they ALL were interested in blogging - some in a positive way, some not. Those not were of the “I get paid for this, why would I give it away?” ilk.
Lots to think about. Thanks for the post!
Hi Joel,
Thanks for the thoughtful comment.
Since you’re familiar with big tech, as I am, I know you’re familiar with market-making marketing. My experience is around IBM and they don’t take a temperature poll to do their messaging. They throw a flag in the ground and throw up a tent pole that creates an umbrella for their marketing and then they take thought-leadership and ownership of “ebusiness” “On demand” and others.
While I understand your point, I don’t agree that an open forum for discussion moves the needle forward in the slightest bit.
Yet, it’s not my conference, and while I’m a supporter and attendee, I respect however you would like to handle it.
All the best,
Jeff
Sorry to be the one to disagree, but I’m currently at the WineFuture conference in Rioja Spain. Turns out I know more wine writers who are becoming bloggers than I know wine bloggers becoming wine writers. I just finished listening to Robert Parker and Jancis Robinson talk about how good bloggers will rise to the top and that bloggers are an important and fundamental part of wine promotion. Video will be posted in a day or two, but you can read the live transcript at: http://catavino.net/wine-future-live
Blogger is a term with great brand recognition. And I think we are building a very good brand. Would be a shame to let the industry take that away from us. Let alone give it up freely.
Jeff,
Marketing budgets at IBM are huge enough to drive marketing that way, make no mistake.
“My experience is around IBM and they don’t take a temperature poll to do their messaging. They throw a flag in the ground and throw up a tent pole that creates an umbrella for their marketing and then they take thought-leadership and ownership of “ebusiness” “On demand” and others.”
There you’re not correct, those terms are very much customer driven marketing. Its understanding what your community of users (in the case of IBM) are looking for and capturing the product functionality and marketing “term” to encapsulate those ideas and communicate the value of the big, complicated products they are trying to sell.
Besides, thats not what I’m talking about. I’m saying that because 10 people comment on your blog agreeing with you I can’t go “yup, thats that everyone wants” when 400 people attended in June and many attended in Portugal as well.
I can’t sit in San Jose and say that the entirety of wine bloggers should call themselves “online wine writers” - thats not how it works.
Most of what I’ve done for the blogger conference and the blogging community was purely from listening, observing, and giving the community what it sounds like they want/need (which, by the way, is what I do for high-tech as well).
I’m not talking about decision by committee. I’m talking about assessing the market conditions to make the right decision for everyone.
Joel and Ryan,
Thanks for the comments. Really, I don’t have enough vested interest to debate positions on it. Blogger / wine writer—whatever. And, I don’t say that flippantly, I say that sincerely.
My point within the context of my post is they are quickly becoming one and the same, the rest is semantics.
My regards to both of you and thanks again for commenting.
Jeff
A very insightful and well-thought out post. It will be interesting to see where we are a year from now. Thanks Jeff.
P.s. Do we now need to change the name of the Wine Bloggers Conference to the Online Wine Writers Conference now?