GoodGrape
Home Wine News Articles Shop for Wine Accessories About Links Downloads Contact

Good Grape Wine Company

Left side of the header
Right side of the header

Follow the Story – Beaulieu Vineyard

An interesting thing happened last year with the release of the ’07 Cabernets from Beaulieu Vineyard – winemaker Jeffrey Stambor put his signature on the label of their more modestly priced wines. 

This isn’t of small significance.  And is, perhaps, a harbinger of things to come.  In the gentlemen’s way of the wine world a handshake means a lot, and, well, signing your name on something means even more.

Managed by corporate behemoth Diageo (and involved in a transaction as a financial instrument this summer), the quaint notion of a handshake may be blunted, but the value of a signature remains the same.  And, correspondingly, with the signature on the label, quality in the bottle has taken a sharp turn for the better, most notably at the high end, but not entirely removed from the low-end, as well.

Long a Napa bellwether, Beaulieu hasn’t been known for much over the last 15 years except for their history—the long history dating to 1900 and their legacy with legendary winemaker André Tchelistcheff, a mentor to Joel Aiken who handed the full winemaking reins to Stambor in ’09.

While nostalgia is wonderful, it doesn’t come close to approximating the withering demands of market forces and the reality is that Parker failed to provide a review of the flagship Cabernet, the Private Reserve Georges de Latour, from 2002 to 2005 with scores the decade prior being something of a hit-and-miss mixed bag for a $125 bottle of wine.  For many wineries, as the high-end goes, so it goes for the low-end wines.

image

Attention from Parker has changed though and that is likely a result of conscientious investment in Beaulieu from the mothership.

Stated as an outlier, the thrust of this post is not the signature on the bottle, a symbolic gesture indicating the winemaker stands firmly behind the product, but the fact that while Beaulieu seems to be keeping their investments in raising the stakes on their winemaking reasonably close to the vest, the proof is in ratings. 

Utilizing a “winery within a winery” concept made familiar with Rodney Strong’s introduction of the same internal benchmarking, Parker said of the 2007 Private Reserve Georges de Latour:

“One of the most dramatic revelations in my California North Coast tastings was the resurrection/renaissance of Beaulieu Vineyard, one of the historic names in California winedom. This was the source of some extraordinary Cabernet Sauvignons in the fifties, sixties, and early seventies, but the winery fell on hard times and was sold (it is now owned by the gigantic Diageo company). However, they have come back with a vengeance over the last few vintages. Michel Rolland, the brilliant wine consultant, was brought in to help resurrect the Private Reserve program, and it appears his magic has spilled over onto the other wines as well.”

Aside from the 95 score from Parker, given in the December 2009 issue of Wine Advocate for the 2007 Private Reserve Georges de Latour Cabernet Sauvignon, Ray Isle also has a flattering, lengthy piece in the current issue of Food & Wine highlighting the turnaround at the winery.

Lest anybody get too caught up in the fumes of wine marketing and the internet, the simple fact remains that Parker moves markets and the old way of doing business is still productive.  For those keeping score at home:

Diageo and Beaulieu made a commitment to increasing quality originating a “winery within a winery” concept and hiring Michel Rolland

Based on PR, sampling, outreach from the winery, or the fact that Rolland was involved, Parker revisited the wines and gave high marks

Around the same time, outreach for a visit to Isle was made resulting in an article in the current November issue of Food & Wine

Beaulieu is now advertising Parker’s comments (as seen in the The Quarterly Review of Wines, Summer 2010, and presented below)

Changing perceptions in the wine business is a long-term game that starts with money and focus before traversing through influencers and media that trickles down to consumers.  This was the case 25 years ago and is still largely the case today.

To do my own “trickle-down economics” litmus test on Beaulieu, I picked up both the 2006 and the 2007 Beaulieu Napa Valley Cabernet found in my market at around $16.99.  The differences between the ’06 and the ’07 are stunning, and doing a side-by-side tasting is an experiment I advocate for anybody interested in examining the direction wineries make to resurrect market demand.  Simply, the ’07, as compared to the ’06 is lush, ripe and has smooth tannins.  While the ’06 is hard, tannic and not entirely pleasant, the ’07 by comparison is a value gem, lacking the precision of what one might expect from the Private Reserve, but tasting wholly like a quality wine that lives peacefully in the shadows of its big brother.

Beaulieu—worthy of a winemaker signature on the bottle?  Yes.  However, that is just one indicator of a level of intent. Perhaps, more importantly, the takeaway is to follow the story (and the money) that still begins in the vineyard and winery,  goes through Parker, the most influential critic in the world, and ends with influence on the consumer as represented by popular media coverage and advertising, all as a winery navigates a complex marketplace to affect change in perception … and sales.

image

Reference Article

Ray Isle Food & Wine article on Beaulieu

Graphic Attribution

Scores for PV Georges de Latour taken as a screen capture from eRobertParker.com



share

Posted in, Good Grape Daily: Pomace & Lees. Permalink | Comments (4) |


Comments

On 10/27, 1winedude wrote:

Sure, this is great as always, BUT… have you ever met comedic actor Jeffrey *Tambor* AND made him crack up laughing?


‘Cause I did, once in Toronto several years ago.

Just sayin’.

wink

On 10/27, Albert wrote:

Insightful stuff!  Your perspective on Beaulieu is excellent.  It is interesting from a marketing perspective…  They probably figured that there was enough brand equity in the name to sink a ton into making better wine and capitalize on the new, commitment to quality and a stellar rating from Parker.  Smart move.  Now they can actually feel comfortable putting their name on the product…..

On 08/04, sac prada wrote:

Les gens voient les sacs sur le marché, qui sont placés dans les étagères d’affichage (ou accroché à un crochet sur le dédié), la possibilité de permettre aux gens un regard neuf arrivera un genre de combat une bonne impression, c’est le paquet Bureau intuitive, elle peut susciter l’achat de désir des consommateurs. Si un sac donne le premier sens de rendre les gens mal à l’aise ou ?je n’aime , de même aussi personne ne s’en soucie, et donc aussi une défaillance du produit. Donc, une bonne apparence du Bureau est le succès sur le marché de sac à main est un préalable important.Handmade amende ou pas, le choix de la qualité du produit. La main plus fine, plus la qualité du produit. La raison en ses célèbres du monde
sac prada de marque, en raison de son excellent cuir avec fines faites, si merveilleux main est l’élément vital du produit.

On 09/26, .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) wrote:

I believe this really is one of the most significant info for me personally. And i’m glad reading your article. But wish to remark on few general things, The web site style is perfect, the articles is actually great : D. Good job, cheers…Come and Try to Now. Enjoy the game
top brand mattresses ratings


Archives


View More Archives